Toronto [ZNN] Washington DC's White House Office of Science and Technology Policy's recent investigation of evidence relating to UFOs has been exposed as inadequate, short-sited and perhaps fallacious. In contrast, recent statements by US President Barack Obama made during his trip to New Mexico show the White House is in fact keeping UFO secrets.
The Office of Science and Technology Policy suppresses evidence
There may be indications of administrative obfuscation and suppression of evidence by OSTP officials. The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) - the office charged with responding to a petition by PRG's Stephen G. Bassett's petition in 2011 to have the White House examine UFOs - appears to have allowed significant levels of bias influence its search for information about UFOs.
Well before the required White House response to Bassett's first petition in late 2011, a series of 15 memos were exchanged among OSTP staff and at least two to NASA HQ personnel which show bias against developing a proper and balanced investigation in response to Bassett's 2011 UFO/ET petition.
If the usage of specific language in memoranda is an indication, the OSTP appears to have blundered by making its mind up prior to any analysis of all the evidence - thus undermining Bassett's 2011 petition from the very beginning.
Members of the press may wish to examine one particular October 11 memo to NASA HQ from Mr. Phillip Larson (OSTP assistant). In it Mr. Larson states: "We got tagged with drumming up a response to a ''please acknowledge aliens' petition..."
This less than subtle use of the phrase 'drumming up' appears to connote that an effort was made by the OSTP to fabricate or concoct a response to Bassett's first petition.
To compound this rather injudicious remark by Mr. Larson, he went on in the same memo to say, "This version has their [the White House] unofficial blessing and they didn't require us to do any more clearances...". See October 11 memo at: http://ufodailynews.com/documents/White%20House%20ET%20Petition%20FOIA.pdf
This comment appears to imply the OSTP looked no further than NASA for evidence about the existence of UFOs because the White House did not require the OSTP to make any other inquires to any other government agencies that may have information about UFOs.
This, despite the well known fact that the CIA, FBI, the United States Air Force and Navy, are all on record as having monitored and collected extensive data on UFOs for decades.
Could this also mean the White House did not want the OSTP to delve too deeply into any of the massive declassified government UFO/ET documentation such as the Twining Memo, the Durant Report and the COMETA Report - all of which indicated the UFO matter is fully evidential and has been discussed and analysed by the highest levels of governance on the planet? [See: http://www.foia.cia.gov/search.asp?pageNumber=1&;freqReqRecord=ufo.txt - http://vault.fbi.gov/UFO and http://keyholepublishing.com/Leading-UFO-Documents.html]
In the final analysis, the Larson memoranda will go down in history as being the first preconceived back-room manoeuvre in delaying UFO Disclosure by demolishing the Bassett petition's capacity to gain traction in the media. Then, the eventual public statement by Larson of 'no evidence' on the WE THE PEOPLE web site served to be the final nail in the coffin of Bassett's petition - destroying its political impact and eliminating any incisive media coverage.
This move by the highest office of political scientific policy in the USA - whether spurious or inadvertent - is nothing less than indictable on the level of a Watergate cover-up. The suppression of evidence is never looked upon favourably by the US Judicial system.
If the OSTP feels it operates under some type of preferential immunity - it may wish to seek counsel to determine its level of culpability in this serious matter; especially in the context of the President stating the opposite. (see below)
One must now therefore ask - is there no level of appeal or recourse to examine the inefficiencies of a government agency like the OSTP when the geo-political stakes are so high?
Will Mr. Bassett seek an injunction - halting the White House WE THE PEOPLE process from conveniently expunging his attempt to get at the truth?
Will Congress or the Senate recognize its duty and make enquiries into this matter?
Ultimately - should the courts within the American judicial system now take control of what appears to be an affront to the constitution and a gross miscarriage of justice?
President Obama in Roswell: "Our secrets are going to stay here..."
The courts may indeed wish to hear Bassett's plea because it has now been revealed the President - in his executive capacity - has publicly asserted secrets about UFOs do exist.
Canadian researcher Grant Cameron has discovered that Barack Obama - during his recent visit to Roswell New Mexico, blatantly revealed that there are UFO secrets.
Cameron states: "A real close look at what Obama said actually shows that the President might have gone too far with the joke, and he may actually have confirmed that the United States government that he heads is covering up an ET presence."
Obama said," ...we’re going to keep our secrets here."
Review the entire Cameron article at: Presidential UFO
Review the video of Obama's Roswell statement at: Obama in UFO Roswell Country
Obama's Roswell statements are in complete resonance with those of President Bill Clinton and his statement about alien bodies made in Belfast Ireland in 1995.
Two Presidents - two UFO statements - all in jest? Or is there truth behind the laughter?
Mr. Larson seems to have been left out on a very long and precarious limb.
Review the PRG petition, go to: Disclosure Petition ll
ZlandCommunications Press Releases: http://zlandcommunications.blogspot.ca/
Rockefeller Initiative Related Files:
Toronto Ontario Canada
A news service that takes you to the edge... and beyond.